Search results

Please take into account that this is a multi-generation video. Let's not read too far into things that may just be artifacts.

In the article Beckwith states... “It was in the air, and even with my telephoto lens, the best I could get was a bright orange light" This "in the air" jazz is a classic bit of ambiguous language used by UFO eyewitnesses. See...

Thank you for this. It's consistent with a small fire or perhaps one piece of heavy equipment. Before going on, I'll answer a question: I was just following the logic. Beckwith is frustratingly vague on just about every point. He never said he saw it oscillate naked eye, nor did he say he...

At this point I don't think it's worth talking about the white light. There are too many things it could be, and too many scenarios.

A different approach. This may be a glitch with the sensor "wobbling." Beckwith's camera is the Sony α7R IV. (He writes it as Sony AVIIR4. He's written the Greek letter alpha as "A" and switched up the Roman and Arabic numerals. Heh.) He didn't see the "oscillation" naked eye, after...

I've asked for some clarification in the YT comments section. Aside: His channel is full of woo, including a video he made himself - Matter From Thought - which is about quantum woo.

Now, I don't know what to think. Is this natural speed or sped up? Don't know.

Directional and non-directional lighting. Non-directional light is reflected light.

Or it's a directional light; like a headlight. The vehicle is turning slightly, then turning back. Throughout, we see the non-directional lights on the vehicle.

A bulldozer on a hill at night. But how many degrees above the horizon was it? What's the camera position? Compass direction Same view in daylight. Give us some crumbs.

The bulldozer scenario would also explain why there's some vertical movement during the 40 minute video.

On second thought... it's not changing shape, so not consistent with something swiveling. More like equipment moving back and forth, showing the same profile. Like a bulldozer.

It's forty minutes. Sped up.

Maybe a bucket wheel excavator at night

What it reminds me of is a mining shovel. Back and forth.

He must have submitted a report to MUFON. You have to be a paid MUFON member to access the data base? https://mufon.com/join/

This bit of silent film is super clumsy. Like low budget 1920's silent movie clumsy. -A very serious looking square jawed soldier standing there ready to shoot. Shoot what? A random guy standing ten feet in front of the Flying Saucer? Isn't that a bit late? How would that random guy get...

These are odd looking critters. They are not WWII era American jeeps. Or any American made jeeps. I think these are GAZ-69s, with a difference. They've had the front body work of a Jeep grafted on. Those are certainly GAZ-69 windshields, rather than GAZ-67 windshields. The rear fender wells...

That could be true. Someone took a report. The report was filed away. Which may point to a disinterested going-through-the-motions bureaucratic process. Later, incompetent people are passing along the eyewitness report as literally true in all detail. Same thing applies though. Everything...

This "investigation" illustrates a basic lack of rigor which, just now is all too common. The proper way to conduct a UFO eyewitness interview was worked out in the '50's and was used by Project Blue Book investigators. It was also used by "pro-UFO" investigators for decades. For example...