Search results

I think in the very most recent versions auto track is now there, or it could be just the other one lightning or whatever but even though it's there it just faking it somewhat ie not using contrast detection, but I imagine simulating IR etc is really hard. Pointing the ATFLIR at the L+S track...

I would be pleasantly surprised if any of the 'big' cases were mentioned by name in the report or even by implication. But we shall see.

L+S Slaved means sharing the LOS with the target designated L+S 3.3 L&S Slaved Mode When the FLIR is in the L&S Slave Mode, the L+S option at [PB12] on the A/A FLIR format is boxed, and the MC slaves the FLIR LOS to the MSI L&S target's LOS. If the MSI L&S does not exist then the default LOS is...

Micks videos are great, but they are generally pared down for the more casual observer, you seem to want to discuss details, have you read through the full Gimbal thread? There is a lot of posts that talk about the patents and technical diagrams for the ATFLIR, there are mirrors/heliostats...

L+S being boxed or not doesn't seem like the kind of thing that would change that much, seems like critical information to know what your ATLFIR is pointing at before you fire a missile.

Okay I will post this again here The outer gimbal does not generally have to rotate to track an object side to side. Source: https://youtu.be/AcsAZTKRv5E?t=39

Possibly offshore drilling platforms

A trained observer making mistakes under pressure?

The videos have names, these names seem to have been assigned to them by the US Military as they appear on the official documents requesting the release (although TTSA misspelled it "Gimble" on the form.) So we have the Navy calling the video we are discussing in this thread "GIMBAL" it also...

Because the object is not visible only the glare from a point source which means as it goes over the horizon the glare brightness reduces which reduces the spread of the glare on the camera evenly as is seen possible the glare would reduce from the bottom more slightly. But us thinking it is...

He's confusing GIMBAL with FLIR, GIMBAL is IR only and FLIR switches between TV and IR. Conflation of the videos and accounts is very common.

Not according to the simulator manuals and reference videos. That's not how the system is designed from I can tell. It would need evidence to the contrary to show that it can be SLAVED and not have L+S or SLAVE boxed, and not just the testimony which never specifically states this although it...

The RADAR doesn't have an "L+S mode" it has tracks and one track is designated as L+S. The ATFLIR can be SLAVED to the L+S where you ask it to point at the track designated as L+S, when this is done the ATFLIR get's it's vector from the RADAR and points at it, and moves to track the RADAR...

From what I can see the sphere glare shrinks equally from a large circle to small circle, the Space X capsule changes it's visible shape as some of it goes under water. If it were a sphere going partially underwater and bouncing up again it would go from circle to semi circle to gone and back...

If it were hot and entered the ocean i.e. "splashed" then you would expect it to get very cold quickly and not come back. We see it fade and then come back and then fade again, like the glare is being obscured as Mick demonstrated with his light/book demo. Saying it splashed could just be a...

If you've ever looked out to sea with a telescope/telephoto lens, the horizon shows "swell" or wave motion which can obscure and then reveal things near the horizon periodically. It's entirely possible the object goes beyond the horizon reducing the glare as then a trough rolls through...

Watch the cut in (in the subpanel) video of the ATLFLIR making a transverse sweep here Source: https://youtu.be/AcsAZTKRv5E?t=39

By UFO I assume you mean alien in origin or some other non human origin for the observed phenomena? If in your view the government is saying "UFOs are real" and NASA openly publishes pictures them on the public website, how is it a conspiracy? At this point you are essentially saying UFOs are...

Yup he literally says whatever he thinks his audience wants to hear.

When these videos came out, people, the TTSA with Elizondo, Mellon, pilots on History channel, Fravor etc all appeared on TV/news etc to claim that these videos specifically showed unusual, impossible things. They all appeared on news segments adjacent to these videos or talking specifically...