Search results

My anecdotal experiences with CBD are that if I take enough of a high strength oil I certainly feel some sort of relaxation or at least an actually altered mental state some what. However long term effects are hard to gauge given the cost and variable supply.

We don't know exactly when but I think it was determined worked out that GIMBAL and GO FAST were from the same plane on the same flight because the PRF ID number are the same. And these are set per aircraft per flight...

I looked into laser range finders in the contact of the ATLFLIR, they only seem to be used in A/G mode for ground targeting, i.e. they only use to get a measure of straight line to ground, for A/A mode RADAR tracks provide ranging. So yeah it's likely that even if it were close they wouldn't use...

Honestly it feels like all the same conflation of Kevin Day, Chad Underwood and David Favor's account with the 3 original Navy videos that have never really been properly analysed in public by anyone outside of this forums and a select few others.

Corbels description on the RADAR video says * Unknowns were self-illuminated. However it's not wise to shoot at things that you don't know what they are during a peacetime operation. That's how airliners get accidentally downed.

The ATFLIR autotrack uses contrast detection to track objects, any change to the image that is not purely digital, i.e. switching lenses or optical zooms, likely has the chance to cause the contrast lock to be lost as the image is momentarily lost/indistinct to the sensor. Lock is lost in this...

The bump is the less than smooth transition as the Gimbal rotates over the top and has to adjust, unless you mean the other optics/glare the "light field" i.e. other glare type artifacts also rotating that proves it's not the object itself

Not only has this been discussed, this basically Micks entire point. Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VuSKFwhXhoY The object is a IR glare and rotates at the point where the camera has to physically rotate due to the gimbal mechanism, the horizon is corrected for by the de-rotation...

I agree with the approach and I too enjoy the challenge of analysis and learning about the systems involved, however we should remind ourselves that because the default claim has now shifted our findings can be disingenuously believed to become the claims and this can be used to discredit...

The vector line displays a predicted position in the time specified by the vector time which is changeable. I.e. if you set it to 10 minutes the line extends to a predicted path if the object keeps it's current heading and speed for 10 minutes, this is displayed in the top right of the...

With the 3 Navy F/18 videos our initial analysis was to see if the claims made by TTSA etc were factual i.e. we had some concrete claims to address. What this current crop of videos lacks in comparison that it's seemingly based on the conceit "hey the Pentagon already say UFOs were real, so...

Unless we ever get an interview with Mick and one of either Underwood, Fravor or Dietrich the key technical questions about the footage will never be properly cross-examined. Elizondo just deflected to the experts he said had analysed it and to the other data he claims exists. An recorded...

Re the 138 knot thing, as re my previous post there's a cut here: :24 “Track 781 just sped up to 46 knots. 50 knots. Closing in.” CUT 2?, tracks move slightly and VV changes direction and camera jumps again. :33 “138 knots. Holy s***. They’re going fast. Oh, it’s turning around.” I assume...

Where are you getting that the plane was at 737 metres up a plane that low would be very very noticeable. The triangle object is more likely a normal civilian airliner at 30k+ feet.

At regular intervals throughout the the video this panel changes: from To and then back again In the reference screenshot it shows date/time What does it say "Running in <something> mode?" Why would the time indicator be flashing between a mode and the time? Also in this frame you can...

If the RADAR updates positions every 40 frames of video and the video is at 30fps then every 1.33 seconds of video you get a RADAR update. It's just a way of trying to work out the frequency of the RADAR updates, they could have just timed it with a stop watch but going frame by frame makes it...

Unfortunately there does not seem to be a single frame of the RADAR data where you can read any of the important panels that show settings for the scope display.

They are vector showing direction lines, they can be True or Relative depending on the mode of the RADAR. The length seeming indicates predicted distance that will be travelled in whatever time the RADAR is configured for You can also have "trails" indicating previous position if you want...

Did you mean to post this in the RADAR video thread?

Yeah I was thinking about that So we know there's a cut here :24 “Track 781 just sped up to 46 knots. 50 knots. Closing in.” CUT 2?, tracks move slightly and VV changes direction and camera jumps again. :33 “138 knots. Holy s***. They’re going fast. Oh, it’s turning around.” I assume here...