Search results

So just the local Kansas City cops? I suppose they'll know where to go with it from there.

I mean to the actual authorities, like cops, etc.

Ok, that needs reporting - especially after reading his follow-up comments. Anybody gonna step up? Or point me to where to do it?

That link about the 48-hour demand is from 6 days ago. ;)

This is the video of Nelson where she describes the signing of the yearbook (set to start at 10:25): Source: www.youtube.com/watch?v=tHPOm6yIy6k She says: He asked me if he could write in my yearbook [...] He wrote [the inscription and] 'Love, Roy Moore. Olde Hickory House.' And he'd signed...

Welcome! Big fan of your work. :)

I thought I'd have a little go at collating some of the handwriting and signature samples, as it gets a little difficult sometimes flicking back and forth between them, and even more so when trying to refer them to others. For starters, then, here are all nine verified copies of Roy Moore's...

I asked a CTist the same question not too long ago: the only events she came up with were ones which had motives she agreed with, such as the shooting at a Planned Parenthood clinic. Not being able to understand shooters'/terrorists' motives seemed to play a major factor in whether they could...

Apologies. That was following on from Spectrar Ghost's post, but I forgot to quote it. Fixed now.

But perhaps not irrelevant to the question of whether Girl Y will look honestly at evidence showing they had actually met. Mainly what I was trying to get to with that question was: "what would an honest person with nothing to hide/lose answer to a-d?" - which is what I assumed you were when...

Could be. Or could also include "maybe it was someone who looked and wrote like me who had the same name". I think we also need to add to the analogy, 'cos you've actually got 4-8 guys saying you beat them up, and 30 other people adding that you had violent tendencies. Plus there's your...

Here's a comparison of the writing from the yearbook with some actual blue-black ink: And applying Mick's technique of inverting: And boosting the saturation to 85%:

Also, it's not just about the angle that it's viewed at, or being viewed straight on, but that particular photo. Other photos and videos from an angle don't show the same effect. Source: www.youtube.com/watch?v=trjO9e9YOtA&t=1m58s

I suppose I should have added one more:

I don't think that's quite the point. Let's say the guy said, "you must remember me, you signed my yearbook." You say, "sorry, I don't - but let's see the yearbook". He pulls it out. You see your handwriting and signature. Do you: a) Say, "wow, I guess I forgot" b) Say, "this must be a...

And it would also strongly suggest that he's being somewhat disingenuous and deceitful.

Yeah, one for the experts, I'm sure - and to do it properly would require the original documents. I was just thinking that, in interactions with Moore defenders, it would be nice to be able to point to somewhere that had a comparison of the samples.

Is it worth doing a bit of a handwriting analysis on this, since Moore supporters are focusing on that, or will it get removed as being off-topic or speculative or something?

It's a logical fallacy, huh? Does it have a name? Also gives me the idea to start planning a really good, evidence-based (but false) deathbed confession, just for a laugh. :)

I recommend this video. The guy is hilarious! :)