Search results

The deaths of three protesters have been reconstructed in detail, drawing from videos as well as spatial and forensic evidence. SITU’s findings and relevant evidence are presented for each victim in this section. The reconstruction assigns a group of law enforcement officers as the source of 3...

Obviously -55⁰F is warmer than -64⁰F. Air temperature varies with altitude (higher=colder). Layers in the ISA Standard Atmosphere 1976 Layer Level name Base geopotential altitude above MSL[5] h (m) Base geometric altitude above MSL[5] z (m) Lapse rate ( °C/km)[a] Base temperature T...

Well, that's the deluxe version. I was thinking of starting simple, i.e. in 2D, and a fixed observer track, and change the observed object's path, and build from there—your list looks like a good place to end up at. I'm hoping to get around to it sometime this week.

I'm really interested now in building an intuition of whether the straight-line, constant altitude UAP path is a solution that always pops up, or whether it is rare. Like, if I simulate a UAP that is banking, or speeding up, would the simulated observation data still resolve to a (false)...

that's the one I quoted, I feel it's ambiguous whether "resembling" refers to the size. that's the one I don't have the source for

You're using quotation marks. Did he say it that way? and if so, where?

The onboard navigation system (inertial/GPS) would have a quite precise idea of how the aircraft is moving, that'd make ranging ground (motionless/slow) targets easy. On Gimbal, Edward Current used the clouds to pin down the observer flight path, repeating this method using the sea seems more...

Catching up on the news from Chornobyl: 21 Mar 2022 Ukraine informed the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) that the long-delayed rotation of technical staff at the Chornobyl Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) was completed today, enabling them to go home and rest for the first time since Russian...

Is it true that the "straight and level" scenario is one where the speed of the UAP is also (approximately) constant? Was that your assumption going in? or is it a result? (Apologies, I'm fairly sure you've described this earlier.)

The issue is that a) the observer path is not well known, and b) the GO FAST UAP may be moving. Compare:

this is why I generally stick with the same outlet for maps, everyone has different standards for dealing with uncertain information. The difference between two map creators can easily be greater than the change from yesterday to today.

I thought he might have caught the water churning from it diving off the surface.

The two bolded parts together strongly suggest that the same event that caused the antenna to move also caused the top section of the building to come down. The explanation for that is between the bold parts. Given that some 9/11 truthers have argued how difficult it supposedly was to hit the...

It may be a good idea to condense the information from this thread: https://www.metabunk.org/threads/nimitz-tic-tac-fravor-dietrich-encounter-missile-hypothesis.11838/

I thought it was mentioned on Metabunk before that the submarine was involved in the exercise and launched something, though the Navy denied it had launched that particular UAP. (They'd not want to do e.g. a cruise missile launch with aircraft in the vicinity, that'd be dangerous.) I think...

... in "World Trade Center Building Performance Study: Data Collection, Preliminary Observations, and Recommendations" (FEMA 403), January 2002, page 2-27 Chapter 2: https://www.fema.gov/pdf/library/fema403_ch2.pdf Full report: https://www.fema.gov/sites/default/files/2020-07/fema_403_2002.zip...

So the take of some analysts is that the original plan failed, and that the Russian government is now selling what they can realistically achieve as their original objective to save face. The Russian General Staff issued a fictitious report on the first month of the Russian invasion of Ukraine...

I would strongly suggest not speculating about the cause of the crash. There were 3 crew members in the cockpit, they all had "happy family lives", and to suggest it was pilot error or worse without proper evidence is hurtful to the families of the deceased.

Nope. At the time of the poll, FDA recommendations hadn't been issued yet. You don't need to change your mind to say "I want" after that happened if you answered "yes, when recommended". Counting these as "no" (and counting "unsure" as "no") is unwarranted. (And this data is outdated anyway...

We've discussed this before, and it's not true. Please look up this post, where I'm quoting an article you found: If you want to discuss this further, it's ontopic in that thread, but not here.