Yes. sorry I couldn't find the page number at first but then found it. I guess it really doesn't matter. Clerical error or an update like you said. I'm sure it'll turn into some kind of another hole for Sandy Hook hoaxers. Thanks.
When 26 teachers, students and administrators were shot to death at Sandy Hook Elementary School, it made national news for weeks. But there was one place 2012's largest mass killing was never mentioned: the FBI database that tracks all U.S. homicides.
And that isn't the only major case missing. The 12 people who were killed in an Aurora, Colo., movie watching the premier of a Batman movie aren't listed either, raising questions about the accuracy and usefulness of the federal data.
Do you have any evidence for that assertion that it was "added later"?
The USA Today article is talking about the online FBI homicide database, not about this report. And the article confirms that the Connecticut homicide total in the database is correct, but the supplemental information did not include the school victims:
Connecticut's homicide count is correct, but the FBI's detailed supplementary material includes only the shooting of Adam Lanza's mother at her home in December 2012, just before Lanza went to the elementary school. Lt. Paul Vance says his department submitted a six-page report on the Newtown school victims to the FBI but later identified a mistake. Updated data was provided too late to be reflected in the database, Vance says, but the information should be added soon.
The report in question was published in August 2013, more than a year before your USA Today piece, and it has always contained the notes about the Sandy Hook shooting, and the full-page dedication to the victims.
You can verify that the document contained these things before the USA Today article was published, by checking the oldest archived copy on the Wayback Machine, which is from August 26 2014:
So once again we have the hoaxers who claim the government is so inept that they forget to enter simple information into a database...yet so dastardly and resourceful that they can keep thousands of participating witnesses quiet, with no leaks, in over four years.
Which is it? Is the government really, really good with these various (and totally ineffective) gun control plots or are they the bumbling idiots who don't bother to cover thier tracks in thier own agency's databases?
So once again we have the hoaxers who claim the government is so inept that they forget to enter simple information into a database...yet so dastardly and resourceful that they can keep thousands of participating witnesses quiet, with no leaks, in over four years.
Which is it? Is the government really, really good with these various (and totally ineffective) gun control plots or are they the bumbling idiots who don't bother to cover thier tracks in thier own agency's databases?
Also, it's kind of funny to think that an agency that would participate in such a hoax would draw the line when it comes to fudging an official report.