The processes which go on here i think are great, well thought out and methodical, mostly..
I'm sure they're going to ask you what topics do you think they've not de-bunked effectively? if you spent some time trying to measure your own 'evidence' like i am trying to do, you'll at-least find huge gaps of understanding on many many issues even if not definitive proof against/for a belief you have. Surely putting up any theory against this process is helpful when arguing through it - the sort of process you should take no matter where you are on the scale of believing/disbelieving whichever theories you believe (or don't). How else when you tell others and they raise the same issues with you, how can you share them effectively?