Adam
Member
I wonder. Could the piece have originally been on the roof and been dropped there in the process of removal? Could Someone then, considering its location and what else was happening, have said "Screw it. We'll come back for it later." And then either forgot about it or deliberately ignored it?
I also like George's observation. Seems really stupid to plant a piece where it will engender controversy and leave the means there to point out how it was done......unless.....How about this: The piece was planted by the CT bunch and the means of so doing was left there purposely to......start a CT! Just as logical a piece of backward reasoning don't you think?
It does seem ridiculous. Unless, I guess, the rope broke when the person was planting the evidence?