Search results

Dick Gregory is still going strong! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dick_Gregory He appeared on the Alex Jones show as recently as last year. In fact Dick Gregory seems to be the person who got Prince into chemtrails. Watch from 2:30 here:

Yes. The lunchtime talks at the Cambridge SRM Science were a good idea, but in practice they were a missed opportunity. People like Ian Simpson stood up, presented a lot of untruths, and seemed to feel validated. Nobody actually told him, even gently and politely, that he was talking nonsense.

Having watched the full video, I agree in this case. Even so, with the sheer volume of photographs and video being shot each day, we should expect to see more and more "lucky shots" appearing. It's also why we see so many more pictures of unusual cloud formations etc, of course.

I used that just after I took the above screenshot :)

There really seems to be no level of dishonesty to which Dane won't stoop to further his "cause". And you just know that these quotes will now take on a life of their own and become attributed to "government officials", and that no chemtrail believer will actually take the trouble to source or...

That's part of it, but I find it very disingenuous. If they claim to have so much evidence, why don't they present it to the experts? I find it frustrating that they can stand there and ask vague questions, when you know that they are claiming to have "100% proof" of something nefarious going...

It is interesting: it's one of those "pop culture" things. Just like the concept of a "flying saucer". That phrase dates back to Kenneth Arnold's UFO sighting in 1947, but it didn't refer to the shape, it referred to the motion. He said the craft moved "like a saucer would if you skipped it...

Hello Jon, thanks for posting here. Did Murphy give any indication to you at the time that he believes geoengineering is currently being carried out in our skies, or that aircraft trails are geoengineering? From your post, I assume not. There seems to be a pattern with these "activists" in that...

Not really "unfortunate". The idea that climate change is a hoax seems to be central to Max Bliss's views. But really, whether or not you believe that anthropogenic global warming is a genuine concern doesn't make any difference to the matter of "chemtrails".

I get a message saying I don't have permission to view it.

Well it seems Felderhof didn't feel willing to go public with his more "far-out" beliefs until after he had stopped flying, so it appears he resembles that remark. But yes, I predict that he will be held up as the latest "proof of pilot whistleblowers", even though his claims have nothing...

I found this article, in Dutch: http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/21901121/___Gifpiloot__wint_zaak_tegen_KLM__.html Google translation of the article, slightly edited by me for sense: Wed 18 Sep 2013, 18:15 "Poisoned pilot" wins summary proceedings against KLM by Paul Eldering "Posioned...

Yes you are right. I was thinking about that after my earlier post. The contrail angle will be constant for a given wind speed, of course. The deflection will be small in terms of distance right behind the plane but the angle will still be different.

True, but here the shadow effect is right out of the back of the plane, so the contrail won't have had time to deflect. From those sun angle graphics it looks like the sun was behind and slightly right of the plane (from the plane's viewpoint).

Lots of people in southern England have been reporting fallstreaks today. I think this is the remains of a very old one, which has been slowly drifting in from the east.