Search results

Let's assume it was not digital zoom, where the algorithm might screw up everything (no examples sadly), optically (moving lenses etc) I cannot explain that happening indeed. There is no element in a zoom process that makes the middle of a frame move as such. I was/am also on the CGI camp.

Why not? I don't see what the difference is over everyone being on Twitter/Facebook/Instagram etc etc, revealing details as they whish. Many people want to make a break on YT to make a bit if extra money, even if that means less privacy. And what is privacy anyway.

I agree with some above, we have slipped a bit into speculation. Not surprising, having no data. But indeed lets try to stay to facts.

One argument, over in another discussion (not on MB), was that (paraphrase) "the witness has nothing to gain". Well, he/they now started a channel specifically for this, and called it "Alien society51". Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

I think I started it.. Excuses. :oops:

Ectoplasm!

They say "in a couple of frames". However, I see only one, the one shown by Eburacum above.

1 frame. 1 lousy frame. Sigh. Insect/fluff. Sorry to be so negative but boy do I hate History Channel and their whole crew. Just utter non sense.

From another angle, what would be the likelihood an object would fall down and leave a perfect circle in the ground. Just not possible. It does not even look like earth/soil has been moved. But hey, it sure brings in some clicks (cash) for mr Poppa! I guess even old policemen are not getting...

I see plenty of religions that span hundreds (or thousands?) of years. I would not guarantee that people are quickly fed up by non sense..

@deirdre It seems like a hobby amongst Las vegas folks to have these circles. I see them everywhere, lol.

Since it has been a while Alan from the SGD channel has uploaded a new video, he just made a new small video as a teaser. He shows he has been busy working on granite bowls etc. He will likely come with more videos soon! Goody! Source: https://youtu.be/wTuK6pFXFlQ

Poppa here sure knows how to squeeze everything out of this story, 1 hour podcasts.. Jeez. All the links point to his own podcast. The "imprint" in the ground looks suspiciously like these rings resulting from horses going round and round on a leash. Or a dog on a leash. Not saying it is non...

Meteor debris (meteorite), sounds likely. Funny quote from the text: I believe there is no video or photos from those "9-10 feet tall beings with big eyes and mouths". How convenient. Normally people have their phone ready in a nanosecond.

Just listened to "Discussing the David Grush UFO Whistleblower Saga with Pete Dominick" on Mick's channel, and apart from all the excellent arguments going on, one stuck to me. The way forward to dismiss or confirm any government cover up is by getting a person from security level 50 to testify...

"other dimensions" is a very easy way out to claim there is more, and then just saying "well, QM mkay?" is just poor argumentation as "other dimensions" are still to be proven, also on QM.

Quantity over quality, yup.

Wondering how DG thinks how that would have been done in the midst of WWII, while US and the Nazis not being nice friends and all.

I saw a French news website has picked it up, and a German as well. The French is behind a paywall, but looking at the text, it is not mentioning much more than we know. Just wanted to drop them here, for completeness.