CaptainPhill
New Member
The difference between unaccounted for and missing is hardly a difference at all. If your child went unaccounted for since 9/11/2001, would you consider her missing?
The difference between unaccounted for and missing is hardly a difference at all. If your child went unaccounted for since 9/11/2001, would you consider her missing?
It is exactly like you gave you kids 10,000 dollars for college expenses and required accounting for the spending for that year... And your kid, she gives you a mess of nonsense, no clear accounting, and you can't figure out what she spent the money for. Rumsfeld was upset with accounting, and this accounting issue has no ties to the mythical 9/11 truth alt theory of 9/11. (oops, it is part of a fantasy version of 9/11 with does not make sense)The difference between unaccounted for and missing is hardly a difference at all. If your child went unaccounted for since 9/11/2001, would you consider her missing?
It is exactly like you gave you kids 10,000 dollars for college expenses and required accounting for the spending for that year... And your kid, she gives you a mess of nonsense, no clear accounting, and you can't figure out what she spent the money for. ....
It's not unaccounted for though. It's just not tracked to accepted accounting standards.
So in your analogy it's more like if you don't know everywhere your child has been in the last year, does that mean she's missing now?
It's not unaccounted for though. It's just not tracked to accepted accounting standards.
So in your analogy it's more like if you don't know everywhere your child has been in the last year, does that mean she's missing now?
You comment would totally work if they the military had since accounted for that money and it hadn't tripled to 6.5 trillion missing. Now you other kids are gone too.
It's not missing. It's just the total of transactions that did not have adequate accounting standards. Your other kids also went places and did not tell you exactly where, but they are home now, most of the time.
You can't lose 6.5 trillion. Where would you lose it FROM?
For perspective, Fort Knox "only" holds $0.25 Trillion. So $6.5 trillion is 26 Fort Knoxs.A Ft Knox sized piggy bank?
and again I think it to be critical, whether you agree with the government or not that it's pointed out that not only was it the government who claimed that number to be reality but to better understand just how much money that was in 2001, the amount added to more the the ENTIRE NATIONAL DEFICIT!!! [...]
No, that's not it at all. The problem is the DoD encompasses numerous different organizations and accounting systems that are not interoperable to an acceptable certified level.The core of your argument is that the DoD – the very same DoD upon which the safety of the free world depends – simply does not have sufficient accounting capability or the know-how; taught in Jr. High School's across the planet; that is needed to record the simple, however voluminous, transactions made within its own organization?!