Some girls like Rosalind just adore being at the center of attention.
Well, some people, not just girls. I believe the euphemism is "attention whore."
I agree 100%. I've said several times, those who pedal in conspiracies don't really want their issue(s) heard in a court of law. It would end the money train from speaking engagements, videos, documentaries, books, etc.
Indeed. I refer to that as the "Politics of Power."
It also encompasses social issues, like abortion and the "homeless" (snicker) as well as other controversies. Those people seek attention, have the desire to control and wield power, and have an over-inflated sense of self-importance.
A resolution is the last thing those people want, because that means no more press conferences, news releases, TV and radio appearances, TV and radio interviews, newspaper and magazine interviews, demonstrations, protests, marches, parades; no more pod-casts, web-site, e-mails, cell-phone calls or newsletters; no more tours on the lecture circuit. And no more money.
I think it's more likely she simply knows the lawsuit has no chance, because there's no actual evidence.
Sorry, many folks know about it on FB. I have been in the process of making a full length documentary exposing these "Charlatans", like MJM and company, as well as others, and finally giving a "video voice" with actual facts and a sense of logic to all of this bunk for once.
I've been looking for evidence for years, but there's none to be had.
Start with what we know: A nominal-sized particle --- about 48 microns -- falls at a rate of 2,000 feet per hour. That is the basis for how we used to calculate and plot fallout maps for nuclear weapons detonations or the dispersal of chemical agents at battalion and brigade operations. So then how difficult would it be to collect samples? You could set up air sampling or collection equipment on the ground. You could set up rain-water catch basins. You could buy an helium balloon and send it up with data collection (transmitted by RF signal back to you since the balloon will burst eventually and crash to Earth). You could even rent a plane and fly through the "chemtrails" and collect data.
To my knowledge, they've never done that. They've had what, 10-15 years (since this nonsense started) to collect data/samples and no one has anything?
The claim is that barium, aluminum compounds and other chemicals are in the sky, but they don't fall out? Yes, they do. In fact, you would plot the fall-out for a "chemtrail" in exactly the same way you'd plot the fall-out for a nuclear weapons detonation. All you need is the upper air atmospheric data -- wind speed and wind direction usually given at intervals of 2,000 feet or 5,000 feet (which you can obtain from your local weather service or collect yourself with a meteorological balloon), and the [avg] height/altitude of the "chemtrail" (I don't see where it is critical to know the height of the cloud-bottom or cloud-top for it).
You have your wind-speed/direction and rate of fall, plot it on a map so you can tell exactly where any chemical compounds would end up on the ground, and set up your data/sampling collection there.
Anyway, I wish you well in your endeavor and hope some of this stuff helps you.