Mat
Member
OK, to be frank I had no idea that there was even a WT6 that collapsed? Is this a hoax?
http://thewebfairy.com/killtown/wtc6.html#
Mat
http://thewebfairy.com/killtown/wtc6.html#
Mat
Was WTC6 Blown?
- Thread starter Mat
- Start date
Spongebob
Active Member
Nice photos Mat.
Judy Wood uses the same images of building 6 to show that there were "round holes" dotted around the buildings roof. The holes are not actually round, they are irregular shapes but Dr Judy Wood has no regard for the truth so she actually suggests that these "round" holes were made by the same space based energy weapon that she also claims was used to "dustificate" towers 1 & 2. (I am not making this up btw).
6 was "pulled" as you can see here:
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/wtc6.html
Charlie Primero
Active Member
I didn't either. That website says the tenents of WTC6 were:
| BATF (Alcohol Tobacco & Firearms) | Government | 2,6 |
| U.S. Department of Agriculture - AAPHIS | Government | 2 |
| US Department of Commerce | Government | 6 |
| U.S. Department of Labor | Government | 6 |
| Export-Import Bank of the U.S. | Financial Services | 6 |
| Eastco Building Services | Building Management |
I understand why they blew up WTC7. The only good targets I see in WTC are Commerce and the Export/Import Bank.
Spongebob
Active Member
I suspect that a large portion of WTC1 falling on top of WTC6 had something to do with its structural problems.
The "holes" Judy Wood refers to are full to bursting with steel beams!! I don`t think we need to call in Dr Watsons best friend to solve this one do we...
EDIT: Great picture Mick - do you have any more similar high quality debris images or links to them?
Last edited by a moderator:
Mat
Member
Hi Bob
Thanks for the links. I guess what puzzles my virgin mind to this (I had seen the image before on Judy Wood's crazy interesting theory site) was how any kind of hole like that could have been made. Irrespective of if it was pulled or not, the hole was prior to the building getting "pulled"
Mat
Last edited by a moderator:
Mat
Member
The "holes" Judy Wood refers to are full to bursting with steel beams!! I don`t think we need to call in Dr Watsons best friend to solve this one do we...
Spac lasers or not, thats an awesome scary picture isnt it. Wowzers
I think I got it from 911datasets, there are a number of torrents of collections of images. Some of which I posted in the other 9/11 threads.
http://911datasets.org/index.php/Main_Page
Takes a day or so to download some of them. These are the collections I downloaded:
Last edited:
Yeah, had the debris been gently placed on the roof it would have caused problems, let along being dropped onto it from 800+ feet. Those are giant steel girders you see there. Drop one of those on a building from 800 feet, and see what happens. Then drop 1000 of them.
SR1419
Senior Member.
Agreed-
But that sure doesn't look like "its own footprint" to me...
And...those are some very large pieces for being "dustified"...
Spongebob
Active Member
I think I got it from 911datasets, there are a number of torrents of collections of images. Some of which I posted in the other 9/11 threads.
http://911datasets.org/index.php/Main_Page
Takes a day or so to download some of them. These are the collections I downloaded:
Thanks Mick - always valuable evidence is needed - will have a look!
Last edited by a moderator:
Spongebob
Active Member
Spongebob
Active Member
Charlie Primero
Active Member
Cool pic Mick.
Here's an interesting photo showing the difference among the "other" WTC buildings.
You can see how WTC7 is so much flatter than WTC6 because of the explosives taking out the structural supports.
Attachments
Last edited by a moderator:
I have looked at WIKI building arrangement http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:WTC_Building_Arrangement_and_Site_Plan.svg before and after http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Aerial_photo_of_WTC_groundzero.jpg. Based on this one can clearly see buliding WTC 6 did not collapse, all though it has far more significant fire damage than WTC 7 had, we have to base our evidence on photos and videos taken that day. A video before the collapse of WTC 7 shows only a few small fires and no major structural damage. Also there is a church and a bank building that was right beside WTC 2 and they did not collapse. So based on what I have read on how the fires caused WTC buildings to collapse, the building WTC 6 that stood between WTC 7 and WTC 1, would have collapsed before WTC 7 along with other buildings that are within a closer proximity, yet they never did.
Last edited by a moderator:
